The word on the street is that
the Young Civilians are uncomfortable. What everyone is asking themselves is
why? What makes them feel that way? The answer is not complex. They just
question the official ideology to which they have been exposed and are bothered
by what they see. In order to understand them we need to return to the
foundation of the Republic of Turkey.
The Western and modern Republic
of Turkey was born from the ashes of the Ottoman Empire thanks to a couple of
“Westernized” and “enlightened” members of the military, who would later be
termed the bureaucratic elite. This bureaucratic elite imagined a people
similar to those in the West. They believed that the more Westernized Turkish
society became, the more enlightened and modernized it would be. Therefore they
did not hesitate to ban the ordinary practices of Turkish people and force them
to adopt a new “Western” lifestyle. They banned the language, belief, clothing
and alphabet of traditional Turkish people outright in an effort to sever their
roots in the past. In their view this change should have been applied
overnight, but most of the people did not agree with them. This eventually led
to several disputes between the bureaucratic elite and the people.
Problems stemming from the
Jacobin nature of Turkish modernization remain. And the Young Civilians are
uncomfortable because of the military domination of social and political life,
as well as the legitimacy of a concept of citizenship that is given only to
secular “white” Turks (secular, Sunni, Turk: the Turkish WASP).
The Young Civilians as a
new political actor in Turkey
With the entrance of the Young
Civilians onto the political scene in the wake of the “e-coup” of 2007, Turkish
democracy witnessed a new political debate, one which became a hallmark for
democrats and non-democrats alike. Some writers and columnists, hitherto known
as “democrat,” had difficulty opposing the most recent military intervention,
which targeted the Justice and Development Party (AK Party). The best most were
able to say was “Neither Shariah nor coup,” meaning that if there was the
threat of Shariah, a military coup would be the lesser evil. However, the Young
Civilians introduced the expression “Neither coup nor coup” to Turkish
democracy. They meant that there can be no reason legitimizing military
intervention in democratically elected government. In this sense, the Young
Civilians claimed “the conjunction ‘but’ is the joint offender in Turkey,”
giving the following examples: “It is sad that Hrant Dink was murdered, but he
shouldn’t have challenged Turkey” and, “Coups are evil, but the AK Party would
introduce Shariah without them.” Accordingly, the Young Civilians demand a
“but-free” democracy.
Actually, the Young Civilians
are indicators and instigators of change in Turkish society, something which
became apparent with the attempted military intervention of 2007 – the
so-called e-coup. This attempt differed from previous coups in terms of the
resistance it faced. This significant resistance demonstrated that the
legitimacy of coups was being challenged. There were demonstrations, manifestos
and marches in protest, which contributed significantly to the uninterrupted
continuity of democracy in 2007. Young Civilians was the first group to protest
the intervention, even before the government voiced its own strong objection to
the army’s memorandum. Besides their own protests, manifestos and petition
campaigns, they also collaborated with other groups. They were one of the
leading groups of approximately 20 nongovernmental organizations that
cooperated under the coalition of “70 Million Steps Against Coups” (Darbeye
Karşı 70 Milyon Adım), organizing a huge march on June 21, 2008, in İstanbul.
Approximately 7,000 people of different ages, genders, occupations, social
status and political ideology ignored all their differences and united against
the coups.
A unique voice
One of the most distinguishing
features of the Young Civilians is the peculiar and sarcastic language they
favor, which mixes popular culture with humor. An example was their famous
presidency candidate, Aliye Öztürk. In a move aimed at criticizing opposition
to the presidency of Abdullah Gül in 2007, they created the imaginary
presidency candidate Aliye Öztürk, “a female scholar who lost her job because
she wears a headscarf. She is a little bit Turkish, a little bit Armenian and a
little bit Kurdish. And she is also Alevi. Namely she is one of us.”
Turgay Oğur, the media and
public relations representative for the Aliye Öztürk campaign, stated at a
press conference meeting that, “rather than ‘who can be president,’ we’ve been
talking about ‘who cannot be president,’ in marked contrast to other democratic
societies.” He also underlined that Aliye Öztürk was totally different to the
predefined “legitimate” citizen of Turkey; thus, she was exactly the sort of
person who couldn’t be president. The Young Civilians made this “unacceptable”
Turkish citizen incarnate. She symbolized all the groups in society who lacked
access to the opportunities provided to legitimate citizens. By doing so, the
Young Civilians broadened the borders of democracy from “for secular white
Turks only” to “democracy for everyone.”
Awareness-based activism
Both the structure of their
organization and the variety of their members demonstrates that they also apply
this standard to themselves. They have members from the full spectrum of
Turkey’s social, political, economic and ethnic groups, as well as believers
and non-believers. What brings them together is their awareness. They remain
united in spite of all their differences, due to their opposition to any kind
of inequity or injustice. They give the same democratic reaction to the abuse
of people’s rights, regardless of whether those people are Kurdish, Armenian,
Turkish, believer, non-believer or headscarf wearing.
In addition, they do not have a
hierarchical structure. The Young Civilians originated online and remains
Internet-based; it has no president. It simply has members and event-based
speakers. Anyone from the e-mail group can participate in their decision making
meetings and contribute. In short, they not only demand some “utopian things,” but
also try to realize these demands within their own organization.
1968 generation and the
Young Civilians
In short, the twin pillars of
the Jacobin Turkish democracy of the early 1920s – the sole legitimacy of
military domination and secular white Turks – began to be challenged in the
early 2000s. In other words, the so-called Turkish democracy – the “gift” of
the founding elites – is transforming into a genuine democracy. And the Young
Civilians are a potential instigator of this change. Gökhan Özgün, a leading
columnist in Turkey, thinks that it is the achievability of the Young
Civilians’ demands which so irritates the authorities. “The slogan of the
movement of 1968 was ‘Demand the impossible!’” he remarked. “Although it seemed
like a very aggressive and radical statement, the rulers or authorities were
not uncomfortable with that slogan, since ‘the impossible’ was not something
they could give. However, the Young Civilians demand ‘the possible but
perfect.’ And this is challenging for the rulers and authorities.”
The Young Civilians are
uncomfortable
The Young Civilians movement
predates its own name: They group organized a gathering at Parliament on May
19, 2003, in protest of the style of the festivities held to mark the May 19
national holiday; Youth and Sports Day. Some time later, Cumhuriyet daily
published a story claiming that the “young officers” of the Turkish Armed
Forces (TSK) were “uncomfortable” about several things, including the
aforementioned protest.
In 2006, the as-yet unnamed
group titled their report on the Kurdish issue “The Young Civilians are
Uncomfortable.” The title became even more famous than the report itself and
gave the organization its new name: the Young Civilians.
Contacting the Young
Civilians
Online: www.gencsiviller.net
(Remember, the Young Civilians is an online organization: to
subscribe to
their newsletter is to become a Young Civilian.)
Tel.: +90 212 251 89 49
Fax: +90 212 310 46 76
The fax line is usually busy –
be patient!
Çok isabetli bir analiz
YanıtlaSilYoung civilians will be an good model for youth movements in the Middle East
YanıtlaSilBeshar Azuri
Neslihan Hanım, Turkish Review için başka STK analizi yazıları da yazdınız mı? Yazdıysanız nereden ulaşabiliriz.
YanıtlaSilSevingül Çolak
Bu ilk yazı ama devamı gelecek:) Bundan sonra her sayıda bir sivil toplum kuruluşunu tanıtacağım.
YanıtlaSil